<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Verteego.com Blog | The Sustainability Blog | Sustainability News and Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.verteeblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.verteeblog.com</link>
	<description>The blog for sustainable business and business carbon management</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Verteego Calculates its Carbon Footprint by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/sustainability-blog-verteego-carbon-footprint-calculation/2009432/#comment-9170</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=432#comment-9170</guid>
		<description>I actually went to Sweden, but it happened once</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually went to Sweden, but it happened once</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verteego Calculates its Carbon Footprint by Keenan</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/sustainability-blog-verteego-carbon-footprint-calculation/2009432/#comment-8511</link>
		<dc:creator>Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=432#comment-8511</guid>
		<description>Prabhakar,

The reason our travel emissions were so low in 2008 is due to the fact that we did not have any air travel. All of our employees take public transportation to work, which, thanks to the fact that France uses mostly nuclear energy, has an extremely low carbon footprint. 

The most polluting part of our business travel was the occasional taxi to or from the train station when on sales trips. 

Thanks for analyzing our footprint so closely! Let us know if you see any other questionable figures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prabhakar,</p>
<p>The reason our travel emissions were so low in 2008 is due to the fact that we did not have any air travel. All of our employees take public transportation to work, which, thanks to the fact that France uses mostly nuclear energy, has an extremely low carbon footprint. </p>
<p>The most polluting part of our business travel was the occasional taxi to or from the train station when on sales trips. </p>
<p>Thanks for analyzing our footprint so closely! Let us know if you see any other questionable figures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verteego Calculates its Carbon Footprint by Prabhakar</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/sustainability-blog-verteego-carbon-footprint-calculation/2009432/#comment-8155</link>
		<dc:creator>Prabhakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=432#comment-8155</guid>
		<description>I am not a carbon emissions expert but I recently reserved an air round trip from San Diego to San Francisco and the the total carbon emissions as computed by the travel agency website (they are in on this as well and want to make us feel guilty despite it being against their revenue/goals) was 450 lbs of CO2.

And based on Verteego's carbon output for 'transport of persons' it is 500 kg and that means it is essentially 2 round trips from SD to SF. I find that incredulous if there is no travel involved in a software selling/consulting type business. Either the travel agency computation is way off or your 'transport reporting' is way off :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a carbon emissions expert but I recently reserved an air round trip from San Diego to San Francisco and the the total carbon emissions as computed by the travel agency website (they are in on this as well and want to make us feel guilty despite it being against their revenue/goals) was 450 lbs of CO2.</p>
<p>And based on Verteego&#8217;s carbon output for &#8216;transport of persons&#8217; it is 500 kg and that means it is essentially 2 round trips from SD to SF. I find that incredulous if there is no travel involved in a software selling/consulting type business. Either the travel agency computation is way off or your &#8216;transport reporting&#8217; is way off <img src='http://en.verteeblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EPA Proposes Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule by Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA &#124; Portable Greenhouse</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/epa-greenhouse-gas-reporting-rule/2009364/#comment-7766</link>
		<dc:creator>Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA &#124; Portable Greenhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=364#comment-7766</guid>
		<description>[...] Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA   Posted by root 20 minutes ago (http://en.verteeblog.com)        Epa proposes greenhouse gas reporting rule there is a 60 day public comment period and two public hearings verteego com the sustainability blog is proudly powered by wordpress entries rss and comments rss        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA   Posted by root 20 minutes ago (http://en.verteeblog.com)        Epa proposes greenhouse gas reporting rule there is a 60 day public comment period and two public hearings verteego com the sustainability blog is proudly powered by wordpress entries rss and comments rss        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EPA Proposes Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule by Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA &#124; Portable Greenhouse</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/epa-greenhouse-gas-reporting-rule/2009364/#comment-7765</link>
		<dc:creator>Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA &#124; Portable Greenhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=364#comment-7765</guid>
		<description>[...] Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA   Posted by root 11 minutes ago (http://en.verteeblog.com)        Epa proposes greenhouse gas reporting rule there is a 60 day public comment period and two public hearings verteego com the sustainability blog is proudly powered by wordpress entries rss and comments rss        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA   Posted by root 11 minutes ago (http://en.verteeblog.com)        Epa proposes greenhouse gas reporting rule there is a 60 day public comment period and two public hearings verteego com the sustainability blog is proudly powered by wordpress entries rss and comments rss        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive EPA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Sustainable Office – Part 8: Furniture by Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive The &#124; My Site</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/verteego-sustainability-green-your-office-furniture/2009250/#comment-7755</link>
		<dc:creator>Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive The &#124; My Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=250#comment-7755</guid>
		<description>[...] Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive The   Posted by root 36 minutes ago (http://en.verteeblog.com)        Comment by damien january 31 2009 2 22 am 8 furniture verteego com the sustainability blog is proudly powered by wordpress entries        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive The   Posted by root 36 minutes ago (http://en.verteeblog.com)        Comment by damien january 31 2009 2 22 am 8 furniture verteego com the sustainability blog is proudly powered by wordpress entries        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Verteego com The Sustainability Blog Blog Archive The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verteego Calculates its Carbon Footprint by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/sustainability-blog-verteego-carbon-footprint-calculation/2009432/#comment-6964</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=432#comment-6964</guid>
		<description>...per capita :)
Since if we grow by a three-digit figure as it seems, we will simply not be able to comply with this goal which would lose its rationale anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;per capita <img src='http://en.verteeblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Since if we grow by a three-digit figure as it seems, we will simply not be able to comply with this goal which would lose its rationale anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verteego Calculates its Carbon Footprint by Keenan</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/sustainability-blog-verteego-carbon-footprint-calculation/2009432/#comment-6963</link>
		<dc:creator>Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=432#comment-6963</guid>
		<description>I think you are right to point out that reporting our footprint in terms of carbon dioxide equivalents rather than carbon equivalents is a little more transparent or even "honest" as the figure is higher. 

Verteego's overall emissions for 2008 were 11,560 kg CO2e. To convert any other figures from carbon equivalents to CO2e, simply multiply by 44/12. 

With a 6% reduction, our goal for 2009 will be to reduce our emissions by at least 694 kg CO2e.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right to point out that reporting our footprint in terms of carbon dioxide equivalents rather than carbon equivalents is a little more transparent or even &#8220;honest&#8221; as the figure is higher. </p>
<p>Verteego&#8217;s overall emissions for 2008 were 11,560 kg CO2e. To convert any other figures from carbon equivalents to CO2e, simply multiply by 44/12. </p>
<p>With a 6% reduction, our goal for 2009 will be to reduce our emissions by at least 694 kg CO2e.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verteego Calculates its Carbon Footprint by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/sustainability-blog-verteego-carbon-footprint-calculation/2009432/#comment-6961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=432#comment-6961</guid>
		<description>We are indeed rather proud of our low footprint but still, we'll try and reduce our carbon emissions / headcount ratio in 2009 by 6% (twice what the Kyoto protocol advocates for).

Keenan, don't you think we should probably communicate our carbon footprint in CO2 rather than just in C? It would make the figure higher and hence have a more significant impact on people's minds.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are indeed rather proud of our low footprint but still, we&#8217;ll try and reduce our carbon emissions / headcount ratio in 2009 by 6% (twice what the Kyoto protocol advocates for).</p>
<p>Keenan, don&#8217;t you think we should probably communicate our carbon footprint in CO2 rather than just in C? It would make the figure higher and hence have a more significant impact on people&#8217;s minds.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sustainability at Ben and Jerry&#8217;s by Hot News &#187; Ben And Jerry S Locations</title>
		<link>http://en.verteeblog.com/sustainability-ben-and-jerrys/2009387/#comment-6814</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot News &#187; Ben And Jerry S Locations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.verteeblog.com/?p=387#comment-6814</guid>
		<description>[...] Scoop: Ben and Jerry Free Cone Day 2009 &#124; SEI Design Group Blog...Verteego.com &#124; The Sustainability Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sustainability at Ben and Jerry&#38;...         &#171; Neil Barofsky Les Moonves &#187;     &#169; 2009 http://hot-news.dreamhosters.com/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scoop: Ben and Jerry Free Cone Day 2009 | SEI Design Group Blog&#8230;Verteego.com | The Sustainability Blog &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Sustainability at Ben and Jerry&#38;&#8230;         &laquo; Neil Barofsky Les Moonves &raquo;     &copy; 2009 <a href="http://hot-news.dreamhosters.com/" rel="nofollow">http://hot-news.dreamhosters.com/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
